Fatal Security Lapse? Our Legal Take: 3 Shot in Savannah Apartment Shooting

https://www.georgialegalreport.com/files/2016/07/WTOC.com_-300x196.png

WTOC.com

Fatal Security Lapse? Our Legal Take: 3 Shot in Savannah Apartment Shooting

Did negligent security contribute to this triple shooting? Read Our Legal Take to find out if the if the victims and their families may have a legal avenue for justice and a claim for compensation.

Local News

A shooting at the Live Oak Apartments in Savannah reportedly claimed the life of 22-year-old Josh Lewis and left two others injured Sunday, July 24, 2016. WTOC.com reports that “three people were shot outside of the Live Oak Apartments on Waters Avenue near Montgomery Crossroad early Sunday morning.”

WJCL News 22 reports, “Josh Lewis and George Thorpe were found with gunshot wounds when officers arrived at the Live Oak Apartment Complex at about 2:30 a.m. on Sunday. [Mr.] Lewis was taken to Memorial University Medical Center where he died from his injuries. [Mr.] Thorpe was treated for non-life threatening injuries.” A third victim was apparently transported to the hospital in a private vehicle. His condition has not been released.

According to the WJCL.com report, “[p]olice believe the three men were outside an apartment when they were shot.”

Our Legal Take

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided to those at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

  • July 2016 Crime Map (spotcrime.com)

    July 2016 Crime Map (spotcrime.com)

    How did a gunman gain entry to the property? What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, bright lighting, surveillance cameras, and security patrols, were in place to protect residents and guests at the time of the shooting?

  • 2016 crime reports from Spotcrime.com reveal a number of assaults in the surrounding area. Was the apartment complex aware of any prior criminal activity on or near the property?  If so, were additional security precautions implemented by the property owner or management to deter crime?

By law, property owners in Georgia are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm.  Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner or management company failed to provide adequate security, the family of Mr. Lewis may elect to seek justice and pursue a legal claim for his wrongful death. Additionally, Mr. Thorpe and the other victim of this shooting may elect to pursue claims for their injuries.

Based upon its long, extensive, and successful experience in handling negligent security cases against property owners in the State of Georgia, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We Fight for Victims of Apartment Security Negligence in Georgia…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

Headline Frame Fox News DeskThe Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for victims of unsafe properties in Georgia, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for one of our Georgia Clients in Fulton County State Court.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 912.385.9690. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice


Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.

728x90 Justice

Contingency Fees Disclaimer: “Contingent attorneys’ fees refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.